Hide menu

Results

Experiment 1

I found that Prdm2 knockdown did not affect innate anxiety levels. Indeed, the two experimental groups did not show any significant difference either in the relative time spent on the open arms of the elevated plus maze (Fig.4a) or in the locomotory activity in the open field test (Fig.4b). 

Fig.4: Relative time spent on the open arms of elevated plus maze (EPM) (a) and locomotory activity in open field (b) among the treatment groups.

However, Prdm2 knockdown had a significant effect in the cued fear conditioning paradigm. Specifically, Prdm2 knockdown rats showed higher freezing behaviour than controls (Fig,5).

 

Fig.5: Freezing behaviour during cued fear conditioning paradigm among the treatment groups. * represents P < 0.05.

Experiment 2

Despite the fact that there were no significant differences among the groups, both witnesses and stressed subjects showed a tendency for higher anxiety-like behaviour than controls. Indeed, witnesses and stressed subjects spent less time on the open arms of elevated plus maze than controls (Fig.6a). Moreover, witnesses and stressed subjects spent less time in the centre of an open field than controls (Fig.6b).

Fig.6: Relative time spent on the open arms in the elevated plus maze (EPM) (a) and time spent in the centre of an open field (b) among the treatment groups.


Responsible for this page: Director of undergraduate studies Biology
Last updated: