1. Wilmshurst, J. M., Hunt, T. L., Lipo, C. P., & Anderson, A. J. (2011). High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(5), 1815-1820.

2. Thomson, V. A., Lebrasseur, O., Austin, J. J., Hunt, T. L., Burney, D. A., Denham, T., ... & Linderholm, A. (2014). Using ancient DNA to study the origins and dispersal of ancestral Polynesian chickens across the Pacific. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(13), 4826-4831.

3. Gering, E., Johnsson, M., Willis, P., Getty, T., & Wright, D. (2015). Mixed ancestry and admixture in Kauai's feral chickens: invasion of domestic genes into ancient Red Junglefowl reservoirs. Molecular ecology, 24(9), 2112-2124.

4. Schütz, K. E., Forkman, B., & Jensen, P. (2001). Domestication effects on foraging strategy, social behaviour and different fear responses: a comparison between the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and a modern layer strain. Applied animal behaviour science, 74(1), 1-14.

5. Al-Nasser, A., Ai_Khalaifa, H., Al-Saffar, A., Khalil, F., Albahouh, M., Ragheb, G., Al-Haddad, A., Masaly, M. (2007). Overview of chicken taxonomy and domestication. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 63, 285-300.

6. Henriksen, R., Johnsson, M., Andersson, L., Jensen, P., & Wright, D. (2016). The domesticated brain: genetics of brain mass and brain structure in an avian species. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-9.

7. Jensen, P. (2006). Domestication—From behaviour to genes and back again. Applied animal behaviour science, 97(1), 3-15. 

8. Kruska, D., & Röhrs, M. (1974). Comparative-quantitative investigations on brains of feral pigs from the Galapagos Islands and of European domestic pigs. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 144(1), 61-73.

9. Henriksen, R., Gering, E., & Wright, D. (2018). Feralisation—The understudied counterpoint to domestication. In Origin and evolution of biodiversity (pp. 183-195). Springer, Cham.

10. Favati, A., Leimar, O., & Løvlie, H. (2014). Personality predicts social dominance in male domestic fowl. PLoS One, 9(7).

11. Rauw, W. M., Johnson, A. K., Gomez-Raya, L., & Dekkers, J. (2017). A hypothesis and review of the relationship between selection for improved production efficiency, coping behavior, and domestication. Frontiers in genetics, 8, 134.

12. Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., ... & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999). Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 23(7), 925-935.

13. Pizzari, T. (2003). Food, vigilance, and sperm: the role of male direct benefits in the evolution of female preference in a polygamous bird. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 593-601.

14. Fessler, E., Zuk, M., & Johnsen, T. (2001). Social dominance, male behaviour and mating in mixed-sex flocks of red jungle fowl. Behaviour, 138(1), 1-18.